The Influence Of Supervising Lecturer's Professional Practice On The Efficiency Of Trainee Teachers During Teaching Training

Shukiman Sukardi

doi:10.54604/tdb.v11i2.41

Authors

Shukiman Sukardi IPG Kampus Gaya, Kota Kinabalu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54604/tdb.v11i2.41

Keywords:

Supervising Lecturer, Teaching Training, Professional Practice, Trainee Teacher

Abstract

This study aims to examine the Influence of Professional Practice of Supervising Lecturers on the Effectiveness of Trainee Teachers during Teaching Training. The main focus of this study is to identify the four elements of guidance in the Professional Practice of Supervising Lecturers, namely Planning, Implementation, Reflective Practice and Attitude & Personality as well as its influence on the effectiveness of teachers throughout teaching practice. The objective of this study is to identify the level of Professional Practice of Supervising Lecturers and the Level of Teacher Effectiveness. In addition to identify the differences, relationships and influence of the professional practices of supervising lecturers on the effectiveness of trainee teachers during teaching practice. The respondents of the study are PDPP Trainee Teachers of Islamic Education Taken in June 2018, a total of 95 people. The design of this study is a descriptive type of survey that uses a questionnaire instrument. The questionnaires used were the Supervising Lecturer Professional Practice Form (α = 0.87) and Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale - TSES (α = 0.86). The data obtained from the questionnaire were analyzed according to mean, standard deviation, t-test, correlation and regression using SPSS (Statistical Package For Social Science (SPSS 23.0). that the Professional Practice of Supervising Lecturers (mean = 4.85) and Teacher effectiveness (mean = 4.67) are very high, while there is no significant difference in the Professional Practice of Supervising Lecturers on gender (t value (95) = 0.36, p> 0.05). relationship, there is a strong positive relationship between Supervising Lecturer Guidance with Trainee Teacher Effectiveness (r = 0.78, p = 0.00) .Furthermore, the Professional Practice of Supervising Lecturer is a predictor of Teacher Effectiveness significantly, [F (1, 93) = 88.61, p <0.05] contributed a 48.8% variance (R2 = 0.488) in the teacher effectiveness score.Further suggestions were also recommended including expanding the study variables and using larger data, increasing tkan study population, study design should be detailed such as using Longitidunal and cross sectional study design. In addition, descriptive and inferential statistical analysis needs to be diversified to obtain a more accurate analysis of study results.

References

Ashton, P. & Webb, R. . (1986). Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy, Classroom Behavior and Student Achievement. Longman.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, L. F. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ efficacy beliefs and concerns in Malaysia, England and New Zealand. Issues in Educational Research, 24(1), 21–40.

Chin, S. H., Roslan, S., Kadir, S. A., & Mahyuddin, R. (2013). Relationship between Sources and Teachers ’ Sense of Efficacy among Novice Teachers in Selangor , Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 21(2), 579–604.

Ghani, Z. P. & R. A. (2003). Pendidikan negara bangsa. PTS Publications & Distributor Sdn. Bh.

Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(4): P569-582.

Ibrahim, M. Y. (2010). Bimbingan Cepat Analisis Data Penyelidikan Untuk Penyelidikan & Sains Sosial. Bandar Ilmu, Kuantan.

Jasmi, K. A. & Nawawi, N. F. (2012). Model Guru Berkualiti dari Perspektif Tokoh Pendidikan Islam dan Barat in Seminar Antarabangsa Perguruan dan Pendidikan Islam [SEAPPI2012] (. International Seminar on Teacher and Islamic Education [SEAPPI2012] at Le Grandeur Palm Resort, Senai, Johor Bahru on 8-9 March 2012, Pp. 233-238.

Jemaah Nazir Sekolah, K. P. M. (2003). Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia- Sekolah : Pernyataan Standard. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Mohd Fairuz Jafar, Shahizan Hasan, A. Y. (2017). Pengaruh Aspek Penyeliaan Pensyarah Dan Aspek Pemerhatian Pengajaran Rakan Terhadap Efikasi Kendiri Guru Pelatih: Satu Struktur Model. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia.Volum 31, No 3. http://spaj.ukm.my/ppppm/jpm/article/view/295%0A

Nolan, A., & Molla, T. (2017). Teacher confidence and professional capital. Teaching and Teacher Education,62, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.004%0A

Osman, N. M. Y. & R. (2010). Hubungan Kualiti Penyeliaan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di bilik darjah dengan efikasi guru. Journal of Educators and Education, Vol. 25, 53 –71.

Rowentree, D. (1981). Statistics Without Tears: A Primer for Non-mathematicians. Penguin Book.

Simin Ghavifekr, Mojgan Afshari, S. S. & A. Z. A. R. (2017). Managing Change In Educational Organization: A Conceptual Overview. MOJEM: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management. https://mojem.um.edu.my/article/view/6151/3858

Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A. W. (2002a). The Influence of Resources and Support on Teachers’ Achievement. Longman.

Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A. W. (2002b). The Influence of Resources and Support on Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs UnderstandingBeliefs? An Exploration of Beliefs Related to Academic Achievement. April 2,2002. New Orleans, La. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Session 13.82: What Is the Value of UnderstandingBeliefs? An Exploration of Beliefs Related to Academic Achievement. April 2,2002. New Orleans, La.